A marketing piece claims guaranteed returns with no risk. Which Standard is violated?

Prepare for the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Ethics Test. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

A marketing piece claims guaranteed returns with no risk. Which Standard is violated?

Explanation:
The key idea is that communications to clients must be truthful and not misleading. A marketing claim of guaranteed returns with no risk tries to present an impossible certainty about investment outcomes. In reality, all investments carry some level of risk, and performance can vary. Saying there are guaranteed returns and no risk misstates a material fact about the investment, which can mislead investors. This falls under not misrepresenting information to clients or prospects. The standard prohibits making statements that are false or misleading about investments, performance, or risks. Even if the piece were accompanied by fine print, the bold claim itself creates a misleading impression about risk and return, which is not permissible. The other options don’t fit as directly. Priority of Transactions deals with the fair handling of orders and allocating investment opportunities, not the truthfulness of marketing claims. GIPS-related standards concern how performance is presented and verified, not the blanket issue of guaranteeing returns. Communications with clients and prospective clients can relate to disclosures, but the central violation here is misrepresentation of investment risk and return.

The key idea is that communications to clients must be truthful and not misleading. A marketing claim of guaranteed returns with no risk tries to present an impossible certainty about investment outcomes. In reality, all investments carry some level of risk, and performance can vary. Saying there are guaranteed returns and no risk misstates a material fact about the investment, which can mislead investors.

This falls under not misrepresenting information to clients or prospects. The standard prohibits making statements that are false or misleading about investments, performance, or risks. Even if the piece were accompanied by fine print, the bold claim itself creates a misleading impression about risk and return, which is not permissible.

The other options don’t fit as directly. Priority of Transactions deals with the fair handling of orders and allocating investment opportunities, not the truthfulness of marketing claims. GIPS-related standards concern how performance is presented and verified, not the blanket issue of guaranteeing returns. Communications with clients and prospective clients can relate to disclosures, but the central violation here is misrepresentation of investment risk and return.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy