A senior portfolio manager is promoted to supervise three portfolio managers. The firm has no written supervisory policies and procedures. According to the Standards of Practice Handbook, what is the most appropriate course of action for her?

Prepare for the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Ethics Test. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

A senior portfolio manager is promoted to supervise three portfolio managers. The firm has no written supervisory policies and procedures. According to the Standards of Practice Handbook, what is the most appropriate course of action for her?

Explanation:
The key idea is that oversight depends on having documented supervisory policies and procedures. A supervisor cannot effectively supervise without clear rules for monitoring, reviewing, and enforcing compliance. When a firm lacks these controls, taking on supervisory responsibility would expose clients and the firm to risk and place the supervisor in an impossible position. Therefore, the most appropriate action is to decline to accept the supervisory role until the firm establishes written procedures that enable proper supervision—covering who oversees what, how trades and decisions are reviewed, how issues are escalated, and how compliance is enforced. This approach protects clients and aligns with the Standards’ expectation that firms implement appropriate supervisory controls before supervision begins. It’s not about forcing the Code on others or resigning; it’s about ensuring the framework is in place so supervision can be effective.

The key idea is that oversight depends on having documented supervisory policies and procedures. A supervisor cannot effectively supervise without clear rules for monitoring, reviewing, and enforcing compliance. When a firm lacks these controls, taking on supervisory responsibility would expose clients and the firm to risk and place the supervisor in an impossible position.

Therefore, the most appropriate action is to decline to accept the supervisory role until the firm establishes written procedures that enable proper supervision—covering who oversees what, how trades and decisions are reviewed, how issues are escalated, and how compliance is enforced. This approach protects clients and aligns with the Standards’ expectation that firms implement appropriate supervisory controls before supervision begins. It’s not about forcing the Code on others or resigning; it’s about ensuring the framework is in place so supervision can be effective.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy